Ireland: Academic Misconduct Index Country Profile
Ireland scores P=12.2 and R=78.8 on the Academic Misconduct Index — the third highest Response Quality score globally. Ireland was the first country to legislate against essay mill services, in 2019. Here is what drives the score.
TL;DR
Ireland scores P=12.21, R=78.8, Q1 (Best in class). Third highest R-Score in dataset. Anchored by the 2019 QQI Act essay mill ban — first such legislation globally. Strong institutional infrastructure across the IUA universities.
TL;DR
Ireland: P=12.21, R=78.8, Q1 (Best in class). Third highest R-Score globally. Anchored by the 2019 QQI essay mill ban — first such legislation globally. Strong institutional infrastructure across the Irish university sector.
AMI scores at a glance
- Prevalence Score (P): 12.21 — 35th of 39 countries
- Response Quality (R): 78.8 — 3rd highest in dataset
- Quadrant: Q1 — Best in class
- Data quality: A (3/6 dimensions from live data)
- Region: Europe
Dimension breakdown
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| D1 Contract cheating | 33 |
| D2 AI submissions | 31 |
| D3 Exam impersonation | 8 |
| D4 Plagiarism | 44 |
| D5 Collusion | 56 |
| D6 Data fabrication | 15 |
What drives Ireland's score
Low dimension scores
Ireland's dimension scores are consistently moderate-low. The D1 score of 33 is tied for the lowest contract cheating signal in the dataset (with Australia and the UK) — all three are countries with specific essay mill legislation.
Low data fabrication (D6 = 15)
Ireland's Retraction Watch signal is low. Irish research output is concentrated at TCD, UCD, NUI Galway, UCC, Maynooth, DCU, and the IT sector institutions; misconduct-linked retractions per publication are among the lowest in Europe.
What Ireland did — the 2019 legislation
Ireland was the first country in the world to legislate specifically against contract cheating services. The Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) (Amendment) Act 2019 (QQI Act 2019):
- Made it an offence to provide, advertise, or operate essay mill services
- Gave QQI statutory powers to prosecute and obtain injunctions
- Set fines and penalties for non-compliance
- Created the statutory framework subsequently adopted by Australia (2020) and the UK (2022)
QQI enforcement
Quality and Qualifications Ireland has used the 2019 Act to:
- Obtain court orders against essay mill websites operating in Irish jurisdiction
- Pursue enforcement actions against providers
- Publish guidance for institutions on identifying and reporting contract cheating
- Coordinate with TEQSA (Australia) and OfS (UK) on supply-side action
The Legislation sub-score of 100 — the maximum — reflects the comprehensive statutory framework.
R-Score breakdown
- Legislation: 100 — comprehensive essay mill ban via QQI Act 2019
- Detection tools: 75 — broad Turnitin deployment across the IUA universities
- Disclosure: 70 — QQI reports, institutional disclosure
- Penalties: 70 — clear, applied frameworks
IUA and the Irish university sector
The Irish Universities Association coordinates the seven Irish universities. The IUA's National Academic Integrity Network (NAIN) coordinates institutional integrity practice including shared use of detection tools, joint position statements, and cross-institutional information sharing on contract cheating providers.
Why Ireland is solidly in Q1
The combination of low Prevalence (12.21) and very strong Response (78.8) places Ireland firmly in Q1. Ireland's small country size and concentrated university sector (seven universities plus the institutes of technology) enable coordinated policy implementation that larger systems struggle to match.
The Irish model — comprehensive legislation, statutory regulator with enforcement powers, coordinated institutional practice — has been adopted by Australia (2020) and the UK (2022) as the template for essay mill regulation.
Implications
For other policymakers, Ireland is the model case. The 2019 Act provides the statutory template, QQI demonstrates that enforcement is operationally feasible, and the NAIN coordination model shows how to implement consistently across institutions.
For employers and admissions offices, Irish credentials carry strong integrity infrastructure signals. The IUA universities (TCD, UCD, NUI Galway, UCC, Maynooth, DCU, UL) share consistent integrity practices.
Sources
- Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) (Amendment) Act 2019
- QQI enforcement reports
- IUA National Academic Integrity Network (NAIN)
- Retraction Watch Database, Crossref/GitLab (2026)
- Academic Misconduct Index v1.5 methodology
View full methodology | Download dataset
Related data
Frequently asked questions
What is Ireland's academic misconduct score?
Ireland scores P=12.21 (Prevalence) and R=78.8 (Response Quality) on the Academic Misconduct Index 2026, placing it in Q1 (Best in class). Ireland has the third highest Response Quality score in the AMI dataset, behind only Australia (88.8) and the UK (87.5).
When did Ireland ban essay mills?
Ireland was the first country in the world to specifically legislate against contract cheating services, through the Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) (Amendment) Act 2019. The Act gives QQI (Quality and Qualifications Ireland) statutory powers to prosecute essay mill operators and providers.
How effective has Ireland's essay mill ban been?
Ireland's R-Score of 78.8 reflects the strong legislative framework. QQI has obtained court orders against essay mill websites and pursued enforcement actions against providers. The Legislation sub-score of 100 — the maximum — reflects the comprehensive statutory framework. Whether this has translated into measurable Prevalence reduction is harder to isolate given Ireland's small sample sizes.
How to cite this article
APA: Booth, F. (2026). Ireland: Academic Misconduct Index Country Profile. Academic Misconduct Index. https://academicmisconductindex.com/blog/ireland-academic-misconduct-profile
BibTeX: @misc{booth2026ireland, author={Booth, Francisco}, title={Ireland: Academic Misconduct Index Country Profile}, year={2026}, url={https://academicmisconductindex.com/blog/ireland-academic-misconduct-profile}}
Francisco Booth
Independent researcher, founder of the Academic Misconduct Index
Related posts